GIS and Media fusion

"The explosive growth of the GeoWeb and geographic information has made GIS powerful media for the general public to communicate, but perhaps more importantly, GIS have also become media for constructive dialogs and interactions about social issues." - Sui & Goodchild

User Tools

Site Tools


carto:proposal

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
carto:proposal [2015/06/26 09:00]
carto [References:]
carto:proposal [2018/05/16 10:05] (current)
Line 32: Line 32:
 ==== Acknowledgments:​ ==== ==== Acknowledgments:​ ====
 ==== References: ==== ==== References: ====
 +Cartographic Web Services: http://​e-collection.library.ethz.ch/​eserv/​eth:​4541/​eth-4541-02.pdf
 +Web cartography with open standards – A solution to cartographic challenges of environmental management: http://​www.sciencedirect.com/​science/​article/​pii/​S1364815209002898
 +CARTOGRAPHIC WEB SERVICES AND CARTOGRAPHIC RULES – A NEW APPROACH FOR WEB CARTOGRAPHY:​ http://​icaci.org/​files/​documents/​ICC_proceedings/​ICC2009/​html/​nonref/​9_3.pdf
 +Cartographic Extensions to OGC Web Map Services – Specifications for a Map and Diagram Service: http://​karlinapp.ethz.ch/​qgis_wms/​publications/​pdf/​CartographicExtensionsfull.pdf
 +EXTENDING OGC STYLED LAYER DESCRIPTOR (SLD) FOR THEMATIC CARTOGRAPHY:​ http://​koenigstuhl.geog.uni-heidelberg.de/​publications/​bonn/​Thematic-SLD.LBS-Telecarto2007.pdf
  
 +FEE, J., Sharing Cartography,​ http://​www.spatiallyadjusted.com/​2009/​04/​21/​sharing-cartography,​ accessed on February, 10th, 2014
  
 +ERTZ, O., LE GLAUNEC, J., BOCHER, E. Collaborative authoring and polypublication of cartographic content. In OGRS 2012 Symposium Proceedings of Open Source Geospatial Research and Education Symposium (Yverdon-les-Bains,​ Switzerland,​ 2012), pp. 295-302
 +
 +Neumann A,  Web Mapping and Web Cartography,​ http://​link.springer.com/​referenceworkentry/​10.1007%2F978-0-387-35973-1_1485.
 +
 +Bocher E, Ertz O, Laurent M, Petit G, Rappo D, "​Cartographie et standard : du modèle à l'​utilisateur",​ 25e Conférence Cartographique Internationale,​ Paris, France, 3 au 8 juillet 2011.
 +
 +Ertz O, Bocher E, Laurent M, Petit G, Rappo D, "​STANDARD-CENTRIC AUTHORING AND PUBLICATION FOR CARTOGRAPHIC CONTENT",​ WebMGS 2010, 1st International Workshop on Pervasive Web Mapping, Geoprocessing and Services, Como, Italy, August 26 to 27, 2010. 
 +
 +Neubauer S, Zipf A (2007) Suggestions for Extending the OGC Styled Layer Descriptor (SLD) Specification into 3D – Towards Visualization Rules for 3D City Models. In: Proc. of 26th Urban and Regional Data Management, October 2007 in Stuttgart, Taylor & Francis
  
  
Line 55: Line 70:
 Verrous scientifiques Verrous scientifiques
  
 +Comment traduire la diversité des représentations cartographiques dans un standard ? Peut-on conceptualiser cette diversité ?
 +Cette diversité nécessite telle des modèles de données particuliers ?
 +Comment modélise t-on les préférences des cartographes ? Peut-on construire des outils adaptés aux compétences des utilisateurs ?
  
 Verrous techniques Verrous techniques
 +
 +Quels sont les outils à mettre en œuvre ? Sont-ils adaptés ? Peut-on les faire évoluer pour répondre aux exigences d'un standard "carto thématique"​ ? Quelles sont les limites en terme d'​usages ? Peut-on restituer toutes la richesse de la sémantique cartographique à travers des IHM ?   
carto/proposal.1435302000.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/05/16 10:05 (external edit)